Thursday, October 27, 2011

Peggy McIntosh: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack

Peggy McIntosh

In relation to my last blog post on B. Deutsch's Male Privilege Checklist, there is also the famous Peggy McIntosh and her list. She has what is called an "Invisible Knapsack". What is in this knapsack?: WHITE PRIVILEGES. McIntosh explores the idea of having this knapsack of privileges wherever she goes. She assures you that it's invisible... but it's there.

Have a read:

1. I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.
2. I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.
3. If I should need to move, I can be pretty sure of renting or purchasing housing in an area which I can afford and in which I would want to live.
4. I can be pretty sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me.
5. I can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed.
6. I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.
7. When I am told about our national heritage or about "civilization," I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
8. I can be sure that my children will be given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race.
9. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.
10. I can be pretty sure of having my voice heard in a group in which I am the only member of my race.
11. I can be casual about whether or not to listen to another person's voice in a group in which s/he is the only member of his/her race.
12. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods which fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser's shop and find someone who can cut my hair.
13. Whether I use checks, credit cards or cash, I can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability.
14. I can arrange to protect my children most of the time from people who might not like them.
15. I do not have to educate my children to be aware of systemic racism for their own daily physical protection.
16. I can be pretty sure that my children's teachers and employers will tolerate them if they fit school and workplace norms; my chief worries about them do not concern others' attitudes toward their race.
17. I can talk with my mouth full and not have people put this down to my color.
18. I can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty or the illiteracy of my race.
19. I can speak in public to a powerful male group without putting my race on trial.
20. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
21. I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group.
22. I can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in my culture any penalty for such oblivion.
23. I can criticize our government and talk about how much I fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider.
24. I can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to the "person in charge", I will be facing a person of my race.
25. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven't been singled out because of my race.
26. I can easily buy posters, post-cards, picture books, greeting cards, dolls, toys and children's magazines featuring people of my race.
27. I can go home from most meetings of organizations I belong to feeling somewhat tied in, rather than isolated, out-of-place, outnumbered, unheard, held at a distance or feared.
28. I can be pretty sure that an argument with a colleague of another race is more likely to jeopardize her/his chances for advancement than to jeopardize mine.
29. I can be pretty sure that if I argue for the promotion of a person of another race, or a program centering on race, this is not likely to cost me heavily within my present setting, even if my colleagues disagree with me.
30. If I declare there is a racial issue at hand, or there isn't a racial issue at hand, my race will lend me more credibility for either position than a person of color will have.
31. I can choose to ignore developments in minority writing and minority activist programs, or disparage them, or learn from them, but in any case, I can find ways to be more or less protected from negative consequences of any of these choices.
32. My culture gives me little fear about ignoring the perspectives and powers of people of other races.
33. I am not made acutely aware that my shape, bearing or body odor will be taken as a reflection on my race.
34. I can worry about racism without being seen as self-interested or self-seeking.
35. I can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having my co-workers on the job suspect that I got it because of my race.
36. If my day, week or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether it had racial overtones.
37. I can be pretty sure of finding people who would be willing to talk with me and advise me about my next steps, professionally.
38. I can think over many options, social, political, imaginative or professional, without asking whether a person of my race would be accepted or allowed to do what I want to do.
39. I can be late to a meeting without having the lateness reflect on my race.
40. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chosen.
41. I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help, my race will not work against me.
42. I can arrange my activities so that I will never have to experience feelings of rejection owing to my race.
43. If I have low credibility as a leader I can be sure that my race is not the problem.
44. I can easily find academic courses and institutions which give attention only to people of my race.
45. I can expect figurative language and imagery in all of the arts to testify to experiences of my race.
46. I can chose blemish cover or bandages in "flesh" color and have them more or less match my skin.
47. I can travel alone or with my spouse without expecting embarrassment or hostility in those who deal with us.
48. I have no difficulty finding neighborhoods where people approve of our household.
49. My children are given texts and classes which implicitly support our kind of family unit and do not turn them against my choice of domestic partnership.
50. I will feel welcomed and "normal" in the usual walks of public life, institutional and social.


-------
Pretty strong stuff.

B. Deutsch: Male Privilege Checklist

There are some of us that have a privilege in some aspect of our lives and don't even know it. Without going to look for power, we don't realized that we have it. Although I am East Asian and a woman (and I can be oppressed within and across gender in comparison to a man, and racially with white men and women) I hold privileges too
Economically: I grew up privileged. I've been working since I was 14, but having family money put me at ease. I had a back-up plan if anything were to happen... emergency money was a phone call away.
Abilities: I'm able bodied. I can walk, speak, have basic motor skills to button up my shirt. I don't have to look for limited parking spaces that are reserved for people like me, yet, people who don't need them take them anyway. I can enter establishments with or without ramps, automatic doors and elevators big enough for my wheelchair. I hold privileges as an able-bodied individual.
Sexuality: Having never questioned my own heterosexuality, I hold privileges of being straight. I can publicly display affection for my significant other without concern that I am being watched, judged and the basis for a joke.
...
Without looking for power in these areas, I just have them. And these powers and privileges I possess cannot be forfeited just because I am oppressed by gender and race. Powers are not exchangeable. 
Below is B. Deutsch's Male Privilege Checklist that was posted on Black Coffee Poet's Blog (by Jorge Vallejos).


I appreciate that it doesn't just address issues of wage gaps and violence when discussing gender studies. It addresses privileges men have various levels of the social world.
Here it is: 
1. If I’m a teen or adult, and if I can stay out of prison, my odds of being raped are so low as to be negligible.
2. I am not taught to fear walking alone after dark in average public spaces.
3. Chances are my elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex. The more prestigious and powerful the elected position, the more likely this is to be true.
4. I can be somewhat sure that if I ask to see “the person in charge,” I will face a person of my own sex. The higher-up in the organization the person is, the surer I can be.
5. If I’m careless with my driving it won’t be attributed to my sex.
6. If I have sex with a lot of people, it won’t make me an object of contempt or derision.
7. I can ask for legal protection from violence that happens mostly to men without being seen as a selfish special interest, since that kind of violence is called “crime” and is a general social concern. (Violence that happens mostly to women is usually called “domestic violence” or “acquaintance rape,” and is seen as a special interest issue.)
8. Every major religion in the world is led primarily by people of my own sex. Even God, in most major religions, is usually pictured as being male.
9. Magazines, billboards, television, movies, pornography, and virtually all of media is filled with images of scantily-clad women intended to appeal to me sexually. Such images of men exist, but are much rarer.
10. If I am heterosexual, it’s incredibly unlikely that I’ll ever be beaten up by a spouse or lover.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Diesel Brand: The modern colonizers?



Appropriation: To take over goods, resources, knowledge and ideas.



Diesel, the Italian brand clothing company aren't killing Natives. They're just buying them. 


In their ad campaign for "Diesel Island", they use appropriation of colonialism through humour to mock the history of murder and inhumane acts toward Indigenous individuals. 


We've seen ads that were just ridiculous. And most times, we skim through these ads and pay it no mind. This doesn't excuse the advertisers, companies, designers etc. to advertise whatever they like behind the protective wall of humour.


Ad reads: "Instead of conquering and island and KILLING NATIVES, we decided to
simply buy it. (Besides, have you seen the price of weapons these days?)"



Apparently, theft of an island is still the okay thing to do. ... Really? 


This may not seem like much of a controversy to a lot of you who many not have a background in Colonialism or marginalization for that matter. But think of it this way for example:

If you're black: Imagine if this ad read, "Instead of supporting slavery or lynching black people to reinforce our position of power, we decided to simply buy your 'blackness'. Besides, have you seen the price of slaves lately?"

If you're a woman: Imagine if this ad read, "Instead of using rape as a weapon and sexually assaulting any women we please, we decided to simply buy your sexual objectivity and strengthen the power dynamic. Besides, have you seen the price of weapons lately?"

If you're LGBTQ: Imagine if this ad read, "Instead of cyber/bullying the LGBTQ community, we decided to simple buy your gayness. Besides, have you seen the price of emotional distress from suicidal attempts in lawsuits lately?"

...Hit closer to home yet?


The above ad is a portion of the message that Diesel is sending: "We're not killing natives... no no that's bad. But we're gonna make fun of it, and simultaneously using our economic status we're gonna buy it. We're gonna use privilege through hegemony and make light of our history as colonizers and commodify it. This way, everyone is happy. You are entertained, the Indigenous people won't know... and we make money."



If we analyze the above ad, Diesel labels colonizers as "pioneers" that were seeking refuge. The attempt at appropriating through humour is right there---> "...and reality shows". 



The above ad here shows a couple that look like their taking a couples vacation on Indigenous land. Tourism has become the new Colonialism. Diesel are the modern colonizers.

"Land of the stupid, Home of the brave" ????? (Does "Home of the brave" sound familiar to you...?)
Land of the stupid refers to the Indigenous people... and that exact land became "home" to the so-called "brave".

Get it? No?

It's okay. I'll wait.









"Toronto Tempo" by Ryan Emond

I came across a great piece of work by Ryan Emond, a photographer and visual artist from Toronto from my great friends at HeartBeatsTO, who greatly shares my appreciation for the city. Emond gave the go ahead to post this video on the blog. The music in the video is by Clams Casino called "I'm God".

Take a look:

http://vimeo.com/reemond/torontotempo


I hope to interview this guy... Looking forward to telling his story.

Be sure to check out his site (click on Ryan Emond link above) and see some of his video and photography work. Amazing.

You can also access Ryan Emond's page on Facebook here

Toronto Cat Rescue




Some people forget that animals are living organisms that have rights. Whether you're consider yourself to be "not much of a cat-person", a firm believer that animals shouldn't be test in scientific experiments, or a Vegan and animal rights activist that would throw red paint on J.Lo's fur coat anytime anywhere... take a look at this event at the end of this month:




Toronto Cat Rescue "Halloween" Adopt-A-Thon starts October 29th from 10am-6pm and ends October 30th from 10am-5pm. The event is free, but adoption is $99 (incl. 1st set of vaccinations, spay/neuter, 6 weeks of free pet insur.)




Website: www.torontocatrescue.ca
Email: chanagittel@rogers.com
Phone: 416-538-8592

Saturday, October 15, 2011

William Whatcott: Anti-Gay, Anti-Abortion

William Whatcott


William (Bill) Whatcott is a Canadian Social Conservative Activist. He "ACTIVELY" promotes Anti-Gay and Anti-Abortion messages across Canada and even ran for political office.

This is my response.

On Anti-Abortion:

Being Pro-Life or Pro-Choice is really up to the individual. As a man, how is Whatcott to know what it is like to be pregnant? Hell, I don't even know yet.
I understand Anti-Abortion activists' position on the issue that a fetus is still life and that medical institutions along with expecting mothers and fathers may be "playing God". However, I'm Pro-Choice. Why?

- I'm fully aware that bringing life into a family of violence, drugs, welfare or other situations of the sort is no life for a child. Ending up "in the system" without a solid family foundation can be traumatic for a child. Lack of education on safe sex and sex education in general manifest many parts of the world, even in a developed country as Canada. Don't assume that people know what you know.

- Whatcott uses Christianity as an institutional resource to promote Anti-Abortion. May I remind you that using religion is a no-no? Christianity was also used to forced many Aboriginal Children into residential schools to become more "European". Let's not use religion. It separates people more than it unites. Let's be real.

- In the patriarchal society we live in, rape and sexual assaults assign women as the victims and men as the perpetrators (mostly). Forcing a rape victim to bear the child of a rapist is forcing residual trauma.

- There are young girls being raped, end up pregnant with no resources to raise a child.

- Reproductive issues are women's issues^. As much as men have the right to speak out against abortion, it is evident that GLOBALLY, many women have even been forced to have an abortion and have even been sterilized as a racially charged act and a move toward promoting "Whiteness" and masculinity. As much as men have the right to speak out, women have the right to protect their bodies. How is it that abortion was used to control women's bodies, but women can't use it to protect their bodies?

^Women's issues in the West consists of reproductive issues. But of the East and South where political warfare take over women's lives, it is not just reproductive issues, but political ones as well. 

- Anti-Abortion activists may argue that if one did not desire to have children at the time, that they should have abstained from sexual intercourse, be married (at least), or practice safe sex. Furthermore, they may argue that childbirth is somewhat of a "requirement" of femininity. But have they questioned whether the men in the relationship are willing to commit to raising an "illegitimate" child with the woman? Have they questioned what position the pregnant woman is in by raising the child alone? Must I go into the issue of single mothers and the amount of this population in poverty? As much as society as progressed, it is still viewed that women are the primary caregivers. So what ... or who, rather, are we arguing against here...?


On Whatcott's Anti-Gay "Acitivism":


- Being gay is not a CHOICE: Bill Whatcott admitted that he has worked as a gay prostitute to support his drug addiction when he was a young adult. Today, he is protesting against being gay? It's clear that to Bill Whatcott, being GAY is a choice. It is something you do, apparently, and not a part of your identity. Reality check Whatcott, being gay is not a choice. One doesn't just wake up one morning and decide that they want to be gay. Although Whatcott decided to be a gay prostitute to support his drug habit (sniffing glue), this is not what the LGBTQ community just "does".

*** I'm not criticizing Whatcott for being a prostitute. But that he justifies being a gay prostitute to support his drug habit, but those who are actually living as a member of the LGBTQ community is not?

- The unorthodox and discriminatory activism of Whatcott against Gay communities maintains the negative views of those communities. His acts keep discrimination, marginalization, stigma, hate crimes, stereotypes and so on, alive. With all of the suicides of gay adolescents that flooded that news last Fall, you would think that people would understand the detrimental effects of further spreading that hate. And yes, this is a hate crime.

Whatcott protests in Calgary (2009)


- Using Anti-Gay slurs in pamphlets is not activism. It is hate speech. Whatcott refers to gay men as sodomites and child molesters. It is an old but still maintained idea that all gay men are potentially dangerous because they could potentially be pedophiles and potentially harm their children. Potentially. You don't have to study Social Diversity in a post-secondary institution to know that this is for the lack of a better word: WACK.

- Whatcott moves toward making homosexuality illegal. What is more disturbing is that he ran for political office. What is even more disturbing than that is that people voted for him. Moving to make homosexuality illegal implies that Whatcott believes in using the institution of the justice system to discriminate against marginalized individuals in the LGBTQ community. He believes that by making it illegal, the lawful actions against the members of this community will and should be accepted by society. This reverses all of the human and equity acts we've been working so hard on and "justifies" charging LGBTQ members with a crime.

- Human rights is human rights. It is unacceptable that human rights are applied and distributed disproportionately among members of various social divisions. When it is distributed to some and not to others, this implies that the "others" are less human than those privileged by race, economic (class), gender, sexualities, location etc.

- You don't have to be gay. No one is forcing you to. Living next door to a gay couple doesn't make you gay, nor should it devalue their dignity to be gay. However, believing that this population does not "deserve" to breathe the same air as you do, and should be criminally charged is bogus. Ever heard of hegemonic masculinity?
______________

This is the smile of homophobia.


You could look at Whatcott and think that there is something wrong with him as an individual that he acts this way.
You could look at Whatcott's childhood and say that it was his abuse-riddled life that messed him up as a child and thus, presents the man we call today William Whatcott.
You could also look at the system theorists' view that the social institutions are to blame.

It is not required that you choose one. It could be a plethora of factors that created such a man as William Whatcott.
Regardless of these factors, he spreads hate speech and simultaneously is promoting hate crimes that can stem from his actions. This is not biological or a lifestyle. This is Whatcott's choice.

...

Whatcott responds to opponents, "Tough, you live in democracy". Of course a man of privilege would say such a thing.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Violence Against Aboriginal Women

I keep hearing the same idea from people... "Colonialism no longer exists".

What planet are they from?

Colonialism certainly exists and it is continuously maintained through institutions, ideas etc. One way it is definitely maintained is through violence against Aboriginal women. I posted a little something earlier this year on the Toronto Police Department's lack of action to find hundreds of missing Aboriginal women and how the justice systems, policies created and so on are actually participating in colonialism by controlling Aboriginal women's bodies and valuing it no more than for sexual gratification and structure of the power dynamic.

Just because Canada apologized to First Nations people for residential schools and the discrimination endured, does this mean colonialism is over?
Unfortunately, in our society, colonialism coupled with patriarchy still breathes air into discrimination. The effects of colonialism is residual--- it's still here.





The above video is a response to murdered, raped, discriminated bodies of Aboriginal women found in the Lower East side of British Columbia, Canada. Discriminated when they were alive, and discriminated by the justice system after their death.

Some were sex workers and some were just thought to be sex workers by the ongoing stereotypes. But justice isn't served and the media doesn't help.

Robert Pickton case: Aboriginal women who were to participating in the trial of Robert Pickton could no longer testify or participate otherwise due to the lack of protection the women were receiving from the government, police etc.

Murder of Pamela George: Two university students (males) repeatedly tried to pick up Pamela George on a number of occasions. Finally, they ended up killing her and leaving her body with lots of evidence that eventually led to their arrest. After killing George, the two men went to a bar and bragged to friends about the incident. One of the student's mothers washed their bloody clothes. The next day, when the news reported Pamela George's death, one of the men left for Banff and "hung out" with friends.
--- The two men were charged with manslaughter, not murder, despite the incriminating evidence found on and around George's body. In the media, they portrayed the two murderers as "unfortunate" because they actually were good students and their future is "ruined". Seriously?

It's disturbing how these two men were able to enter AND leave the space where such violence is accepted, brushed off etc. Meanwhile, Pamela George signed a contract when entering this space. And was never able to leave.